Matthew Castle designated this collection as the foundational information structure for both sites on November 4, 2026. It contains ten distinct September 2, 2026 working documents. Eleven files were supplied; two copies of the relationship matrix were identical.
How the documents guide an answer
The charter governs the method. Definitions and the glossary control the meaning of terms. The claims ledger separates an interpretation from evidence; the theology map distinguishes scripture, Church teaching, model interpretation, analogy, and speculation. The matrix records relationships. The evolution ledger and source registry preserve provenance. The research backlog records questions and review work.
The AI retrieves relevant records with their document version, paragraph or table location, and item-level status. New answers cite foundational records alongside the published study edition. Neither a research task nor an AI assessment counts as completed independent human review.
The ten foundational documents
| Document | Role | Version |
|---|---|---|
| Canonization Charter | Governance | v0.1 2026-09-02 |
| Corpus Registry | Source inventory | v0.1 2026-09-02 |
| Concept Evolution Ledger | Development history | v0.1 2026-09-02 |
| Claims and Epistemology Ledger | Claims and evidence | v0.1 2026-09-02 |
| Canonical Definitions and First Principles | Definitions and first principles | v0.1 2026-09-02 |
| Canonical Glossary | Terminology | v0.1 2026-09-02 |
| Resonance Matrix and Website IA | Relationships and website structure | v0.1 2026-09-02 |
| Website Information Architecture | Website architecture | v0.1 2026-09-02 |
| Scripture and Theology Map | Scripture and theology | v0.1 2026-09-02 |
| Research Backlog and External Review | Research and external review | v0.1 2026-09-02 |
Working sources and later developments
Adopting these documents as the foundation does not erase their pending, provisional, restricted, legacy, or retired labels. It does not turn them into official Church doctrine or verified science. The later published study edition remains available as a separately identified development of the model.
Where the versions differ, the guide should name the source and explain the difference. An unresolved definition remains an open question rather than becoming an invented founder decision.
Offer and Acceptance
The September 2 review definitions require an intentionally presented Offer and sufficiently understood voluntary Acceptance. The later published study edition broadens Offer and distinguishes agentic Acceptance from informed consent. Identify which version is being used; do not merge them or claim the pending review decisions have been ratified.
Perfect Truth
The September definition treats Perfect Truth as undistorted reality with Christ as its theological axis and marks ontology/theology wording pending. The published study edition identifies the Father as Perfect Truth and Christ as Perfect Expression. This is a source-version distinction, not a new official Church teaching.
Lesser and Elemental Truth
The foundation drafts restrict higher/lower language and distinguish Truth from understanding; the published edition retains later LT-01 lesser-Truth formulations. Preserve the later formulation as a documented published position while identifying its difference from the supplied review draft. Do not invent missing ratification records.
Spiritual field and Snap
The September drafts contain metaphor, Lab-only, legacy, and retired restrictions; later published passages retain some realist spiritual-imprint and threshold hypotheses. Name both source status and evidence status. Neither a retained hypothesis nor a founder decision establishes a measurable mechanism or scientific proof.
Resonance and Dissonance
The foundation definitions describe coherent correspondence and diagnostic mismatch with pending wording. Later published definitions add real transpersonal or spiritual scope. Preserve that version difference; disagreement or discomfort never establishes another person's spiritual failure.
Evidence and privacy
This catalog identifies the working sources and their uses. Private correspondence, allegations, and internal research records are not published wholesale. Source inventories do not give the AI access to every document or conversation named within them. Interpretations remain open to correction; a relationship score is an editorial aid, never a measurement of spiritual worth.
Edition record
foundation-2026-11-04-6a27478b0bac · 5676 indexed records across 10 distinct documents.
Both sites use an identical snapshot. Updates require a reviewed import and deployment; earlier saved answers retain their source edition.