SOURCES & DEVELOPMENT

A model that can be examined.

Source versions, editorial decisions, and the remaining limits of this study edition.

What governs this edition

The October 2026 study edition was reconciled against the September working reference and the following model documents. Their roles differ: a reference records intended meaning, a glossary controls terminology, and an audit identifies questions and defects. An audit recommendation is not automatically a new founder decision.

SourceRole in this edition
Reference Memory v2.0Current identity, architecture, theological distinctions, and hypothesis scope.
Canonical Definitions and First Principles v0.3Definitions, relationships, and limits of current terms.
Canonical Glossary v0.3203 entries, retaining their distinct source statuses.
Reconciliation Working Register v1.19Later clarifications and separation of current, provisional, and historical language.
Comprehensive Coherence Report v2.0Logical checks, mathematical defects, unresolved questions, and proposed editorial repairs.

What changed from the overview

The site now distinguishes the active Five from the full Nine. Consecrate is fifth; Continue is sixth; Culminate, Cross, and Converge remain distinct. Confirm is not an additional numbered Law.

The seven-part Sin Cycle preserves Collude and remains separate from the provisional Nine Shadows. Ascension has its own chapter, connected to covenant, the Nine R’s, the continuing soul journey, and outward Return.

Grace is initiating and enabling, not postponed until after unaided repentance. The Father, Jesus Christ, and the Holy Ghost retain their personal theological roles. Redemption concerns the same continuing person.

Lesser Truth is not flattened into error. Expression and Reception remain recursive. Agency, Acceptance, consent, and nonchosen responses remain distinct. Forgiveness does not collapse trust, reconciliation, access, and reinstatement into one event.

The spiritual-imprint and collective-visibility proposals retain their intended realist scope while their unspecified mechanisms remain visible. The collective threshold concerns Christ-directed hearts and shared visibility of an already-present Christ, not a measurable headcount or universal salvation.

How new exposition is identified

Chapter prose connects the source concepts for a reader. Worked examples and reflection questions are editorial teaching applications, not founder anecdotes, new revelations, or new ratifications. The brief descriptions of the provisional supporting systems are teaching glosses.

The relationship explorer is an editorial reading map. It does not claim to reproduce the complete formal matrix. The scripture companion separates a passage’s content, a model connection, and a limit on what can be inferred.

“Canonical” and “working canon” describe the model’s controlled vocabulary. They do not assert infallibility, empirical proof, or Church endorsement.

What remains open

This edition reflects the source versions listed above. It does not claim that every historical conversation, notebook, or revision has been recovered. The exact approved body of G-01, “Divine Truth, Living Guidance, Cultural Conditions, Unseen Opposition,” was not available in the recovered material; no missing text has been reconstructed from its title.

The metaphysical hypotheses still require clearer accounts of mechanism and evidence. Their intended meaning should neither be softened into metaphor by default nor presented as established science. The provisional R’s, Keys, Meta Laws, and Shadows remain provisional.

These limits concern the state of the written framework. They do not turn disagreement, uncertainty, or an unfinished formulation into a judgment about a person.

Continue the examination

Read the exact term, follow its related concepts, name the premise supporting the claim, and distinguish an illustration from an argument. The model’s own principles of Compare and Correct apply to the model.